MINUTES
Town of Blowing Rock
Board of Commissioners
September 12, 2006
The
Town of Blowing Rock Board of Commissioners met in regular session on Tuesday,
September 12, 2006 in the Town Hall Council Chambers. Present were Mayor Lawrence, Commissioners
Bobby Ball, Keith Tester, Terry Lentz, Rita Wiseman and Tommy Klutz. Others attending were Town Manager Scott
Hildebran, Town Attorney Allen Moseley, Town Engineer Doug Chapman, Town
Planning Director Kevin Rothrock, Public Works Director Johnny Lentz, Police
Chief Owen Tolbert, Building Inspector Jesse Horner, Emergency Services Director Kent Graham,
Parks & Recreation Director Jennifer Brown, and Town Clerk Sharon Greene.
Call to Order
Mayor
Lawrence called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. and welcomed those in
attendance.
Approval of Minutes
Upon
a motion received from Commissioner Lentz, seconded by Commissioner Ball, the
minutes for meetings held on August 8, August 10, and August 22, 2006 were
approved as written.
Public Hearings
Planning
Director Kevin Rothrock and Charles Neal were sworn to speak during the public
hearing.
1. CUP #2006-14
Planning
Director Kevin Rothrock presented Council with a request from Charles Neal for
a conditional use permit to stucco and paint the sides of the
During
the August 17, 2006 meeting of the Planning and Zoning Board, a recommendation
to approve the conditional use permit was made with the following conditions:
1.
That the
applicant receive approval from the building inspector and the structural
integrity of the existing brick is verified.
Commissioner
Wiseman stated the mortar was deteriorating and needed to be retooled and asked
if the applicant planned to stucco the area instead. She had concerns regarding the vertical cracks
and the hurricane rods in the building. She felt the building had structural problems
that an engineer should assess. The applicant Mr. Neal stated a structural
engineer had not looked at the building.
Commissioner
Lentz asked if stucco met the designs standards of the Town. He felt this was a massive building and the
proposed use of stucco would take away from the charm of the downtown area,
whereas, the existing brick would be more appropriate for the downtown area.
Town
Manager Hildebran stated that technically the proposed request for the use of
stucco was allowed, but he understood Commissioner Lentz’s concerns. Mr. Hildebran stated that Council could look
into prohibiting the use of stucco in downtown in order to maintain the integrity
and appearance of the downtown area.
Commissioner
Klutz asked if wire lath was going to be used, and if so would it be nailed
onto the building. The applicant replied
that it would be used and that was how it usually was applied. Commissioner Klutz felt it would only
accentuate the problem if it were not corrected. He stated that he would prefer that the
applicant clean and re-grout the proposed area.
Mr.
Neal stated that it would be very visible if it were done that way. He also stated the grout was approximately
100 years old.
Commissioner
Tester stated it only amplified the concerns that Commissioner Klutz spoke of,
with nails being put in the worst places where the grout was very old. He also inquired if this was the best way to
fix the problem or just the least expensive way. Mr. Neal stated that it was not necessarily
the least expensive because stucco would have to be used on the whole area not
just the area in need of repair. Mr.
Neal stated that stucco had been used on the back of the building approximately
10 years prior without any major problems occurring. Commissioner Ball asked if Mr. Neal had done
the work then and if it had held up well.
Mr. Neal stated that he had and it was holding up well.
Commissioner
Wiseman was concerned that the stucco would cause too much weight to be added
to the building. She was also concerned
with the cause of the vertical cracks that were there now.
Commissioner
Klutz asked if the building was brick or brick veneered. Mr. Neal stated it was brick. Commissioner Wiseman said that only added to
her concerns since no block was present.
At
this time Ginny Stevens asked Council if the contractor from Boone Construction
could speak regarding this subject. Mayor
Lawrence advised that anyone wishing to speak would need to be sworn in by the
clerk. Mrs. Stevens and Mr. Ron Funk
were duly sworn.
Mr.
Funk advised that in older buildings like this one, sometimes there are several
layers of brick that can be as much as 16 inches thick this could be measured
by openings in the building such as windows and doorways.
Commissioner
Lentz felt the building was too tall for this much stucco. He stated the intent of the code was to keep
the downtown area looking as original as possible.
Mr.
Neal asked Commissioner Lentz if he would be in favor of re-grouting and
painting. Commissioner Lentz stated he would rather see it re-grouted than the
use of stucco. Commissioner Klutz stated
a clear sealant could be used instead of paint.
He also stated before proceeding with this project he would like to hear
a report from an engineer regarding the structural problems.
Mr.
Neal stated he felt that two issues were being discussed; one being the
structure and the other aesthetics. He
felt if a decision could be made on the aesthetics, it would also help to
determine what would be best structurally.
Commissioner
Wiseman asked Planning Director Rothrock if the draft CUP stated a structural
engineer would be required to inspect the proposed project. Mr. Rothrock stated that would not be needed,
because he felt the building inspector’s requirements would be sufficient. Commissioner Wiseman felt the integrity of
the mortar as well as the brick should be verified. Mr. Rothrock stated the only reason the
applicant came before the Planning Board and Council was because adding the
stucco would be an exterior change. He stated if the applicant left the
building brick no permit would be needed.
He also stated that a building permit would be required if any structural
changes were to take place.
A
motion was made by Commissioner Tester to close the public hearing, seconded by
Commissioner Wiseman. Unanimously
approved.
Commissioner
Lentz moved to deny the request for CUP # 2006-14 as presented, seconded by
Commissioner Tester. Unanimously
approved.
2. Code Amendment – Residential
Driveway Definition (Ordinance #2006-06)
Planning
Director Rothrock presented Council with a clarification of the Land Use Code
as it pertains to shared driveways, stating that a zoning subcommittee had met
in August to study the issue. He stated
the committee had developed the attached draft which was approved by the
Planning Board.
The
Town’s policy in the past was to allow shared driveways for two lots. This limited land disturbance and provided
access to existing lots that might otherwise be “landlocked”. The policy had not allowed people to create
lots that are landlocked and also have access through a shared driveway. Any lots created must have the required
minimum width according to the Code.
The
draft ordinance would simply clarify and codify the town policy regarding
shared driveways as well as provide minimum width and slope standards for such
access.
Commissioner
Klutz inquired if the draft addressed access through residential property to
commercial property. Mr. Rothrock stated
the draft did not address this specifically, but the ordinance itself did.
Commissioner
Lentz voiced his concerns regarding the percentage of grade for driveways as he
felt there should be a leveling area at the end of a steep grade for safety
purposes.
Commissioner
Klutz also wanted to address the issue of driveways becoming roads in
residential areas.
Mr.
Rothrock asked if Council wished to address these issues at the present time,
or would rather staff study it further and bring the issues back before Council
at a future meeting. Commissioner Lentz
stated he felt this issue should be tabled for further study.
Commissioner
Wiseman made a motion to table the public hearing for Ordinance #2006-06 until
the October meeting. Commissioner Klutz
seconded the motion. Unanimously
approved.
3.
Financing Proposal –
Town
Manager Hildebran presented Council with two Resolutions regarding financing
for the proposed
Since
2004, Town Staff has been researching potential financing options for the $4
million plus Emergency Services Facility.
The Town explored the possibility of acquiring a low interest loan from
the USDA-Rural Development Administration’s (RDA) Community Facilities Loan
Program. A formal application was
submitted and the Town was awarded a $2,200,000 loan for a 40-year term at
4.25% interest rate, which covers a portion of the total cost. Based on construction bids received by the
Town, $2.5 million is still needed for the proposed project. The Town will need to finance that portion.
Town
staff met with several area banks to discuss various financing options that
were available and drafted requests for proposals (RFP’s). The RFP solicited
bank quotes for the following options:
Option 1 – utilize the USDA loan of $2,200,000 for 40 years and borrow
up to $2,500,000 for 20 years to cover the balance of USDA shortfall (This
option requires an interim $2,200,000 construction loan for the USDA portion,
as required by USDA regulations).
Option 2 – borrow up to $4,700,000 for 20 years for the entire project
costs.
On
September 1st, the Town received a multitude of responses from the
following banks – First Citizens, Wachovia, Bank of America, BB&T, RBC
Centura, Northwestern, and AF Bank. The
low bids received for each option are:
Wachovia
up to $2,500,000 4.39% 20 years
RBC
Centura
up to $2,200,000 3.68% 24 months – Constr. Loan
RBC
Centura up to $4,700,000 4.22% 20 years
After
reviewing all proposals, staff proposes to use Option 2 – an installment
contract to finance the total project.
Option 2 reduces the debt service term from 40 to 20 years and will
allow the Town to save over $1,282,000 in interest and fee costs in lieu of
Option 1. Overall
Paycheck Comparison on Loan Options for
Due
to the joint-use of the facility, the Blowing Rock Volunteer Fire Department
has agreed to contribute up to $1,350,000 towards the project cost over a
twenty-year period.
Staff
recommends that Council adopt Resolution #2006-11 stating its findings that an
installment contract is a necessary and expedient method for the proposed
project and authorizing filing of application of financing approval with the
N.C. Local Government Commission.
Also,
it is recommended that the Option 2 financing be awarded to low bidder- RBC
Centura to borrow up to $4,700,000 for 20 years at 4.22%, subject to approval
by the Local Government Commission ad adoption of Resolution #2006-12.
After
some discussion, Commissioner Wiseman made a motion to accept Resolution
#2006-11 to approve LGC application and #2006-12 to approve award of financing
to RBC Centura, seconded by Commissioner Lentz.
Unanimously
approved. Resolution
#2006-11 Exhibit B - Resolution #2006-12 Exhibit C
Old Business
1.
Mrs. Ginny Stevens
approached Council with an update regarding the restoration of Edgewood
Cottage. Mrs. Stevens stated the
building exterior was supposed to be finished by September 1, 2006 but several
things had taken more time than they originally anticipated which put the
project behind schedule. Mrs. Stevens
stated the project should move forward as planned at this time. She stated Boone Construction Co. had been
hired as the general contractor, and introduced Mr. Ron Funk the project
manager to Council to answer any questions they had regarding the project.
Commissioner Wiseman
asked when the foundation would be poured and the building set. Mr. Funk replied in approximately 90 working
days this should be accomplished.
Mrs. Stevens also
asked for permission to have a plaque erected at the site keeping residents and
visitors updated on their progress. Council was in favor of the plaque.
New Business
1. Blowing
Town Manager
Hildebran presented Council with several bids that were received for the
Amber
Contracting
Blue
Ridge Enterprises $4,393,000.00
David
Looper & Co. $4,558,318.00
Enterline
& Russell No
Bid
J.R
Vannoy & Sons $5,282,500.00
Wilkie
Construction No
Bid
Wishon
& Carter No
Bid
Mr. Hildebran stated
that project architect Garner & Brown A.I.A recommended the project be
awarded to the lowest bidder, Amber Construction. He also stated site work could possibly begin
the following week. Mr. Hildebran stated
the money for the project would be available by October 15th and after
permits were obtained, work could begin shortly thereafter.
Mr. Hildebran
introdued Neal Brown of Garner & Brown and Doug Chapman of McGill
Associates and also recognized Blowing Rock Fire Department President R.L.
Sudderth and Emergency Services Director Kent Graham for all their hard work in
helping to make this project happen.
A motion was made by
Commissioner Lentz to accept the lowest bid of $4,276,000.00 from Amber
Construction for construction of the
2. Glenmoore Subdivision- Annexation (Resolution #2006-13
& #2006-14)
During their August
meeting, Council approved CUP#2006-10 for the Glenmoore Subdivision. The applicant,
Kevin Donovan requested that as part of the subdivision process the property be
considered for contiguous annexation so water and sewer service could be
available to the lots. A petition, map,
and property description and two resolutions to initiate the annexation process
were presented to Council for their review.
If approved, a public hearing would be set for the October 10, 2006
meeting to consider the annexation of the subject property. Public Notices would also be mailed to
adjacent property owners and advertised as required.
A motion was made by
Commissioner Wiseman, seconded by Commissioner Ball to accept Resolution #2006-13
and #2006-14 as written. Unanimously
approved. Resolution
#2006-13 Directing the Town Clerk to Investigate a Petition Received Under G.S.
160A-31 Attached as Exhibit D – Resolution #2006-14 Fixing Date of Public
Hearing on Question of Annexation Pursuant to G.S. 160A-31 Attached as Exhibit
E- Certificate of Sufficiency Attached as Exhibit F
3. Mayview Madness -5k Road Race (November 11, 2006)
Town Manager
Hildebran presented Council with a request from the High County Conservancy to
hold their 7th Annual Blowing Rock Mayview Madness 5K Run on
Saturday, November 11, 2006.
The 3.1-mile race
would begin at 8:00 a.m. at
A motion was received
from Commissioner Tester approving the request, seconded by Commissioner
Ball. Unanimously approved.
Speakers from the Floor
Mr. Jim Greene of
Mr. Greene stated he
felt the problem could be handled by extending the paved ditch located on his
property upward towards an adjoining property in order to change the flow of
water. Council stated the Town could not
make any improvements to private property.
Commissioner Lentz suggested that letters be sent to all property owners
on Sunrise Cove letting residents know that something would need to be done
regarding the run-off problems that
neighboring properties were experiencing.
Mr. Greene also
voiced his concerns regarding the Thunder Hole Historical Trail being closed by
trees cut by a property owner in that area.
Commissioner Lentz stated the town would check into this, but the trail
was also out of the city limits. He felt
this would be something the Park Service would need to address. Planning Director Rothrock stated he walked
down into the area and talked with a property owner who had cut trees more than
a year prior. Council assured Mr.
Greene his concerns would be reviewed by staff.
Mrs. Ginny Stevens
had questions regarding the town tree ordinance. Mayor Lawrence stated that any trees over 18
inches would require a permit from the town.
Planning Director Rothrock stated if the trees were leaning over
someone’s home or dead, a permit would be required, but the town would not charge
in these instances. But, if someone was cutting trees to enhance their view, or
clearing property, a permit would be required and there would be a charge.
It was suggested that
the tree ordinance be reviewed in the local newspaper for residents unaware of
the guidelines. Town Manager Hildebran stated
the Planning Board was in the process of updating the tree ordinance and within
60 to 90 days a new updated ordinance would be available.
Adjournment
There being no
further business to discuss, Mayor Lawrence adjourned the meeting at 8:10 p.m.
Mayor ___________________________
J.B. Lawrence
Attest: _________________________
Sharon
H. Greene, CMC